From SuperGoo to Scratch

August 11, 2009 at 4:12 pm (Standard 10. Technology, Standard 3. Curriculum, Standard 5. Assessment, Standard 8. Exceptionality) (, , )

The article, From SuperGoo to Scratch: Exploring creative digital media production in informal learning, states that “Youth are not only consuming new media at accelerated rates, they are also becoming producers of these new genres in larger numbers… Media education needs to go a step further to provide youth with experiences creating and designing their own interfaces and applications…” Students are participating socially in new versions of media cultures that use different types of media (games, videos, etc). Giving my students a ready audience for which to write is important, like the article addressed. I just need to see some examples as to how this has worked in other science or psychology classrooms. This may be a good way for students to critique each other’s writing and provide feedback, but with only 8 computers and students who don’t do homework I am not sure how to make this happen. After reading the article, I am left thinking that Scratch (in particular) is a really cool program, but wonder what it has to do with me in a formal educational setting in my science classroom. I would love to see examples of how to use this type of program realistically with my students or how to encourage them to use it to create their own masterworks on their own time. After looking at Scratch for a little bit and seeing the many ways in which it is used I am intrigued, but will need more time with it and plan a time to use it. It seems like a really fun way to get students to share their learning with each other, but I can see students spending more time creating than we really have time for in class. I may give it to my students as a suggestion in lieu of doing a PowerPoint presentation and see what they do with it in the fall. They will be my best indicators for how well this can work in my classroom.
I think that adding technology like this as an option to my classroom for our Chapter Challenges in freshmen science may help more of my students to complete them and show mastery of understanding.

Would you like to check out Scratch? Because users share their creations there are lots of ideas for how to begin.

Permalink Leave a Comment

The Wiki Way of Learning

July 27, 2009 at 5:24 pm (Standard 1. Instructional Planning, Standard 10. Technology, Standard 11. Inquiry/Research, Standard 12. Professional citizenship, Standard 4. Pedagogy, Standard 5. Assessment, Standards 6 & 7. Communication & Collaboration) (, , , , )

Learning about how wikis can show student thinking and allow for reflection and problem solving has helped me to see the benefits of wiki in the classroom. Before reading this article I was ignorant about how beneficial wikis because they allow students to learn from each other, which is the best way to learn.   Wikis allow collaboration, co-construction and demonstrates different ways of learning. There is no expert in a wiki, only collaborators constructing knowledge together.

Wikis provide a quick way for students to construct knowledge socially in an authentic way and provide them the space to reflect on their thinking and how their thinking has changed. Ruth (2004) says that students will be more engaged in learning if they can get help from teachers and other students and if they feel that the task is meaningful. Knowing why a wiki is used is so much more important to me than knowing how they are used. I am looking forward to seeing more examples of wikis working in science and psychology classes to implement the same ideas and wikis for reviewing major concepts in my classroom.

Social and cooperative learning have been shown to be more beneficial to a diverse group of students. Wikis may be another way I reach out to underserved students.

(from abpc.wikispaces.com)

The graphic compares collaboration via email with wiki

The graphic compares collaboration via email with wiki

(from wikinomics.com)

Permalink Leave a Comment

Standard 5 Meta-Reflection: Assessment

August 16, 2008 at 9:23 pm (Standard 5. Assessment) (, )

Philosophy of Assessment 

Standard 5 Assessment indicates I need to assess students’ mastery of curriculum and modify instruction to maximize learning.

This paper articulates my personal philosophy of the relationship between classroom instruction, assessment, and student learning and was the culminating piece of work in my course on standards-based assessment strategies. This artifact demonstrates my knowledge of the “Assessment” content standard by addressing how closely related instruction and assessment are in my classroom. I wrote about the ways in which I assess students’ mastery of curriculum content and my ability to modify my instruction in order to maximize student learning based on the assessments I make during instruction.

This paper caused me to reflect on my teaching practices in light of current research in the area of assessment and grading in the classroom. Purposefully tying both formal and informal assessments into my instruction and then modifying my instruction using those assessments will have a positive impact on student learning. Students will get more feedback on their progress toward learning goals, and I will know better the areas we will need to review before a major assessment.

My philosophy of assessment is related to my daily life in the classroom as a science teacher and all of my interactions with students. I explain that I constantly assess students and I want to continue to have multiple forms of assessments guiding all of the phases of my instructional process.

Philosophy of Assessment

Permalink Leave a Comment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.